Book your Marketing Foundation Sprint now to have your 90-day plan delivered by Jan 1!
You know you need it.
You need someone senior to own your marketing strategy, align your team, make decisions, and connect marketing to revenue.
But you're waiting.
Maybe you're waiting until you hit a certain revenue milestone. Maybe you're waiting until you can afford a full-time VP of Marketing or CMO. Maybe you're waiting until you "figure out" what marketing should look like first.
I get it. Hiring senior marketing leadership is expensive. It's a big commitment. And if you're not sure exactly what you need, it feels risky.
But here's what I've seen over and over: Waiting costs you more than acting.
Let me show you the math.
Let's say you're a $10M healthcare or purpose-driven business. You don't have a VP of Marketing or CMO yet, but you're spending money on marketing:
Marketing Coordinator: $60K/year
Freelance Content Writer: $24K/year
Agency (Ads + SEO): $60K/year
Tools (HubSpot, SEO software, analytics, etc.): $15K/year
Events, Conferences, Misc.: $15K/year
Total annual marketing spend: ~$175K
That's real money. And you're getting ... something. Activity. Reports. Campaigns. Content.
But here's the question: Is that $175K driving predictable, scalable revenue growth?
If you're honest, the answer is probably: "Not really."
Without strategic marketing leadership, here's what that $175K is producing:
Your coordinator launches campaigns based on what feels timely or what the agency recommends. Some work. Some don't. But you can't tell which is which because there's no framework for measuring success.
Your freelancer publishes blog posts. They're fine. But they're not aligned to a content strategy because you don't have one. So the blog is a mix of topics that may or may not resonate with your ICP.
Your agency is running LinkedIn ads and Google ads. Traffic is up. But conversions are low because your messaging isn't clear and your landing pages aren't optimized. The agency can't fix that; they're executing on the brief you gave them.
You have HubSpot. It's powerful. But you're using maybe 20% of its capabilities because no one on your team knows how to set up workflows, scoring, or attribution.
The result: You're spending $175K annually on marketing, but it's not compounding. Every quarter feels like starting over. Nothing scales.
Now let's talk about what you're missing while you wait.
Let's say strategic marketing leadership could improve your customer acquisition efficiency by just 20%. Not double it. Not transform it overnight. Just 20% improvement through:
Clearer targeting (so your ads reach better prospects)
Stronger messaging (so conversion rates improve)
Better lead nurturing (so fewer opportunities fall through the cracks)
If you're doing $10M in revenue and expecting 30% growth, that 20% improvement in efficiency could mean an additional $600K-$1M in revenue over 12 months.
Cost of waiting one year: $600K-$1M in lost revenue.
Without strategic leadership, you're likely wasting 30-40% of your marketing budget on:
Tactics that don't work (but no one stops them because no one's measuring)
Tools you don't need or aren't using effectively
Agencies optimizing for the wrong metrics
Campaigns that aren't aligned to your ICP
That's $50K-$70K per year wasted. Multiply that by two years of waiting, and you've spent $100K-$140K on marketing that didn't move the needle.
Cost of waiting two years: $100K-$140K in wasted spend.
While you're in "patchwork marketing" mode, your competitors are building real marketing functions. They're:
Getting clearer on positioning
Building brand awareness in your target market
Capturing mindshare with your ICP
Winning deals you should have won
Every quarter you wait, they pull further ahead.
Cost of waiting: Market share erosion that's hard to quantify but very real.
Your marketing coordinator is stretched thin. They're executing tasks but have no strategic direction. They're frustrated because they know marketing could be more effective, but they don't have the experience or authority to change it.
Your sales team is frustrated because marketing isn't generating enough qualified leads.
You're frustrated because you're the bottleneck for every marketing decision.
Cost of waiting: Team morale, turnover, and your own burnout.
Let's add it up.
Year 1 of waiting:
$175K spent on marketing (with mediocre results)
$600K-$1M in lost revenue (from inefficiency)
$50K-$70K wasted on ineffective tactics
Declining team morale
Year 2 of waiting:
Another $175K spent
Another $600K-$1M in lost revenue
Another $50K-$70K wasted
Competitors pulling further ahead
Total two-year cost of waiting: $1.6M-$2.4M
And that's a conservative estimate.
Now let's look at what happens if you bring in strategic marketing leadership today.
Investment: $8K-$10K/month for 10-20 hours/week
Annual cost: ~$100K
What you get:
Someone who builds the marketing foundation (ICP, positioning, strategy)
Someone who makes your existing spend more effective
Someone who coaches your team and manages vendors
Someone who connects marketing to revenue
ROI in Year 1:
You're still spending $175K on marketing, but now it's directed by strategy
Let's say efficiency improves by 20% (conservative) → $600K-$1M additional revenue
Let's say you eliminate 30% of wasted spend → $50K saved
Total value created: $650K-$1M+
Net benefit Year 1: $550K-$900K (after paying for fractional leadership)
Investment: $150K-$200K salary + benefits + equity
Annual cost: ~$200K-$250K
What you get:
Dedicated, full-time strategic leadership
Someone who can build and scale a marketing team
Deep integration with company leadership
ROI in Year 1:
Same efficiency improvements: $600K-$1M additional revenue
Wasted spend eliminated: $50K saved
Total value created: $650K-$1M+
Net benefit Year 1: $400K-$750K (after paying for full-time leadership)
This is the most common objection I hear. And I get it.
Hiring senior marketing leadership feels like a big leap. What if you hire the wrong person? What if they can't deliver? What if the timing isn't right?
But here's the thing: The "right time" is when you start losing money by not having it.
You've already crossed that threshold.
If you're:
Spending $100K+ annually on marketing
Doing $5M+ in revenue
Struggling to connect marketing spend to results
Feeling like marketing should be working better than it is
... you're past the point where strategic leadership pays for itself.
You don't have to.
Fractional marketing leadership exists specifically for companies in your situation. You get:
Senior-level strategic thinking
Hands-on leadership and execution
Flexibility as your needs evolve
A path to full-time when (and if) that makes sense
For most companies in the $3M-$35M range, fractional is the right answer. You're not big enough to need someone full-time, but you're way too big to not have strategic leadership at all.
Let's be honest about what "a little longer" means.
If you wait another six months:
You'll spend another $85K on marketing (with mediocre results)
You'll miss another $300K-$500K in potential revenue
Your competitors will gain six more months of market position
Your team will be six months more frustrated
And at the end of those six months, you'll still need strategic marketing leadership. The problem won't solve itself.
Waiting to hire marketing leadership doesn't save you money. It costs you money.
Every quarter you wait, you're:
Spending marketing budget inefficiently
Leaving revenue on the table
Losing ground to competitors
Burning out your team
The "safe" choice–waiting until you're sure–is actually the risky choice.
The smart choice is to bring in strategic leadership now, whether fractional or full-time, and start building marketing that actually drives revenue.
If you're a healthcare or purpose-driven business founder doing $3M-$35M in revenue (or early-stage but well-funded), and this math resonates, let's talk.
I work with companies who are ready to stop waiting and start building marketing that compounds.
The cost of waiting is real. The cost of acting is a rounding error compared to what you're already spending.
Let's fix this.