Book your Marketing Foundation Sprint now to have your 90-day plan delivered by Jan 1!
If you're a founder reading this, you probably didn't start your business to become a marketing expert. You started it to solve a problem, serve customers, or make a difference.
But at some point, marketing became your job anyway.
In the early days, that worked. You hustled–posted on LinkedIn, attended conferences, closed deals through your network, wrote a few blog posts when you had time. Revenue grew. You hired some help: a marketing coordinator, a freelancer, maybe an agency.
And for a while, it still worked.
But now? Marketing feels chaotic. You're spending more but getting less. You have people doing marketing tasks, but no one's driving strategy. And increasingly, you're the bottleneck for every decision.
If this sounds familiar, you've likely entered what I call the "patchwork marketing" phase, and it's costing you more than you realize.
Here are five signs you've outgrown it (and what to do instead).
You're spending $75K, $100K, maybe $150K+ annually on marketing. You have:
A marketing coordinator managing social media
A freelancer writing blog posts
An agency running ads
Another agency that rebuilt your website last year
Various tools and subscriptions you're not entirely sure you need
But when your board or investors ask, "What's working?" you don't have a great answer.
You know traffic is up. Email open rates look okay. The social posts are going out consistently.
But you can't draw a clear line from any of that activity to the deals you're closing.
Why this happens:
No one owns the strategy connecting marketing to revenue. Your team is executing tactics–posting, emailing, running ads–but there's no framework for understanding which tactics actually drive business outcomes.
What to do instead:
You need performance metrics tied to revenue, not just activity. This means:
Defining what a qualified lead looks like
Tracking lead sources and conversion rates
Calculating customer acquisition cost (CAC) by channel
Understanding which marketing efforts contribute to closed deals
This doesn't require fancy tools. It requires someone who knows how to connect the dots between marketing activity and business results.
Your website says one thing. Your sales team says something slightly different. Your LinkedIn posts talk about features. Your ads focus on outcomes. The blog is all over the place.
You've probably noticed this yourself. And if you've noticed it, your prospects definitely have.
Why this happens:
Without a clear ideal customer profile (ICP) and positioning strategy, everyone makes their best guess about what to say. The website team emphasizes what they think matters. The salesperson adjusts their pitch based on the last objection they heard. The junior marketer writes what sounds good.
The result? Prospects are confused. And confused buyers don't buy.
What to do instead:
Get crystal clear on:
Who you're selling to (not "healthcare companies"—specifically, what size, what stage, what pain points)
Why they should buy from you instead of a competitor or instead of doing nothing
What your core message is across every channel
Then document it. Create a messaging framework that your entire team (marketing, sales, customer success) uses consistently.
When your messaging is aligned, everything gets easier. Website conversions improve. Sales cycles shorten. Ad performance gets better.
The first agency promised results. They ran ads, published content, sent reports with lots of charts. But after six months, you couldn't see meaningful ROI. So you fired them.
You hired a new agency. They diagnosed all the problems the first agency missed. They promised better results. Six months later, same story.
Now you're wondering if the problem is you.
It's not.
Why this happens:
Most agencies optimize for their deliverables (ads, content, rankings), not your business outcomes. They're also generalists; they don't deeply understand your industry, your customers, or your specific growth challenges.
Most importantly: they're not incentivized to build your internal capability. Their business model depends on you needing them indefinitely.
What to do instead:
Agencies can be valuable for execution, but they shouldn't be driving strategy. You need someone internal (even if fractional) who:
Owns the marketing strategy
Understands your business and industry deeply
Manages agencies as vendors
Builds processes and systems that work with or without the agency
When you have strategic leadership in place, agencies become useful tools. Without it, they're expensive experiments.
You hired a Marketing Coordinator or Marketing Manager to "handle marketing." They're smart, capable, hardworking. But they keep coming to you with questions:
"Should we focus on LinkedIn or email this quarter?"
"What should the next campaign be about?"
"Do we need a new website?"
And you don't have good answers because you're busy running the business.
Why this happens:
You hired for execution, not strategy. Your marketer is perfectly capable of posting content, coordinating with vendors, and managing campaigns, but they're waiting for you to tell them what the strategy is.
And you don't have time to be the strategist.
What to do instead:
Junior marketers need direction. They need someone to:
Set the strategy and priorities
Define success metrics
Coach them on how to think about marketing, not just execute tasks
Make decisions when trade-offs are required
If you can't provide that (and most founders can't–it's not your job), you need someone who can. This doesn't have to be a full-time VP or Head of Marketing. But it has to be someone with senior-level experience who can lead.
Two years ago, customer acquisition felt easier. Your network was warm. Referrals came in regularly. Marketing was scrappy but effective.
Now? You're spending twice as much on marketing, but growth has slowed. Customer acquisition cost (CAC) is creeping up. Deals take longer to close. Competitors with worse products are winning.
You've hit a ceiling, and spending more on the same tactics isn't breaking through it.
Why this happens:
Patchwork marketing stops working at scale. What got you to $5M or $10M won't get you to $20M or $35M.
At a certain point, you need:
A repeatable system for generating and nurturing leads
Clear positioning that differentiates you in a crowded market
Alignment between marketing and sales
Data-driven decision-making
Throwing more money at random tactics doesn't solve the underlying problem: you don't have a marketing function. You have activities.
What to do instead:
Step back and build the foundation:
Define your ICP and personas (who are you really selling to?)
Clarify your positioning (why should they buy from you?)
Build a marketing strategy (how will you reach and convert them?)
Set up infrastructure (processes, metrics, accountability)
Bring in strategic leadership (someone to own it all)
This takes time. It's not as exciting as launching a new campaign. But it's the only way to break through the ceiling.
If you stay in patchwork mode, here's what happens:
You keep spending $75K+ annually on marketing that doesn't move the needle
Your competitors build real marketing functions and pull ahead
Revenue plateaus while costs rise
Your board or investors start asking harder questions
You burn out trying to be the CEO and the marketing leader all at once
Eventually, you'll hire a full-time VP of Marketing or CMO. But by then, you've wasted 12-24 months and left significant revenue on the table.
If you've outgrown patchwork marketing, you have three choices:
You carve out time to build the marketing foundation yourself–ICP, positioning, strategy, metrics.
Pros: No additional cost
Cons: Takes time you don't have, and marketing strategy isn't your core expertise
Best for: Very early-stage founders who genuinely don't have budget yet
You bring on a $200K+ full-time marketing leader.
Pros: Dedicated focus, builds internal capability
Cons: Expensive, long hiring process, big commitment if it's not the right fit
Best for: Companies doing $35M+ revenue where marketing is mission-critical
You bring in a Fractional Head of Marketing for 10-20 hours/week to build the foundation, lead strategy, and coach your team.
Pros: Senior expertise at a fraction of the cost, flexible, faster to start
Cons: Not full-time (but many companies at this stage don't need full-time yet)
Best for: Companies in the $3M-$35M range (or early-stage but well-funded) who need strategic leadership without the full-time commitment
Patchwork marketing worked when you were smaller. It doesn't work anymore.
You don't need to spend more. You need to spend smarter.
That means building a foundation: clear ICP, strong positioning, aligned messaging, real strategy, and someone to lead it.
If you're a healthcare or purpose-driven business founder and this resonates, let's talk.